Dynamic Network Architecture, next generation networks.
Currently, Internet is a fixed network of protocols, a constrained network architecture that is (almost) safe, deterministic and predictable.
A Dynamic Network Architecture, that is: machines that connects with other machines, has advantages (and cons) like; manageability, privacy preserving, and it grows. The redesign is done dynamically.
The virtual black hole
Imagine that an A.I. can build different encryption methods and dynamic protocols (and links) to preserve your communications, so a black hole appears on the scanners of the security agencies.
To build a black hole is not easy, but once it is done, it can spread to many hosts. The damage control of such a black hole(s) in the current fixed and deterministic Internet, will be more difficult than in a Dynamic Network Architecture.
Trying to develop two next gen networks, a military one and a civil one (Internet) is simply a bad investment.
The EM shock and other disasters
With many electronic devices susceptible to electromagnetic damage (by the sun’s EM storms) and connected to Internet, a DNA can recover faster from a disaster scenario than the current Internet architecture.
How much time it’s needed to reconfigure routers, switches, sub-nets, links, servers, and to tune up web services, users bandwidth, etc… in a disaster scenario?. How much time your business will be down?.